🔗 Share this article

A legislator from NSW has employed parliamentary privilege to disclose the identity of a man earlier accused in relation to the alleged abduction and killing of British toddler Cheryl Grimmer 55 years ago.

Vanishing at Fairy Meadow Beach

The young girl vanished from near a bathhouse while accompanying her parent and siblings at Fairy Meadow beach in the Illawarra region of NSW on January 12, 1970.

Legal Proceedings and Pseudonym

The suspect, known under the alias “Mercury,” underwent a court case in 2018 after pleading not guilty. Yet, the proceedings ended when a judge ruled that a nineteen seventy-one police interview where he admitted to the crime was not admissible.

Mercury made the alleged admission, which was the cornerstone of the crown’s case, when he was seventeen years old and still a minor under state law, and less than 18 months after the child disappeared.

Parliamentary Revelation

On Thursday, Jeremy Buckingham revealed the name of the suspect while shielded under parliamentary privilege.

Guardian Australia is opting not to identify the man. The man could not legally be named during the 2018 because he was just fifteen at the time of the reported offending.

Parliamentary Interruption

Ahead of the MP revealing the name, the president of the Legislative Council of New South Wales, Ben Franklin, interrupted him. He inquired if the member was about to reveal the identity, which is presently mandated to be suppressed by court ruling.

The president said: “Can I just make these observations before you proceed under privilege, a legislator is protected from the repercussions which would normally result from breaching a legal order of this nature, which could otherwise amount to a legal offense.”

“However, all members have the responsibility to use their immunity responsibly, and this chamber can take action against representatives who are judged by the assembly to have abused this right. The comity between the legislature and the judiciary should not be taken for granted, and I urge the member to consider these matters carefully before proceeding.”

Relatives Demand

The disclosure of the man’s identity has come after the toddler's relatives gave an unprecedented demand to the individual last week – agree to speak with them by the deadline or the MP would disclose his name in the legislature.

They also presented a dossier which contains the admission the suspect made when he was 17, according to Buckingham.

Case Reopened

Police restarted the case after a 2011 coroner’s report determined that Grimmer was dead and advised that authorities re-examine.

Mercury was arrested in March 2018, and was then in his sixties. He was freed a later after the interview was ruled unacceptable.

Without it, the NSW director of public prosecutions found there was insufficient evidence for the case to proceed.

Confession Particulars

During the trial, the tribunal heard that during an interview with officers in the early 1970s, Mercury had confessed to murdering the toddler, informing police he had planned to have “sexual intercourse” with the child before allegedly murdering her.

Legal Decision

But the judge decided the interview could not be used as proof in the trial.

In his judgment in the high court, the justice said the questioning was unacceptable because of the manner in which it was conducted and the specific vulnerability of the accused at the time.

“Neither a guardian, adult or lawyer was in attendance at any stage of the interrogation,” the judge said.

He received testimony from mental health experts who concurred that the teenager had a below average IQ, was undeveloped and more at-risk than the typical 17-year-old.

History of the Accused

The court heard the accused had a strained relationship with his parents, a history of fleeing from his residence, relocating internationally, limited intelligence and restricted schooling.

The crown argued that at the time of the interview, there were no compulsory rules or guidelines for an adult support person to be present when interviewing juveniles.

The other information before the court was composed of records from the time and reports from 1970-71, derived from his interaction with the youth legal system.