🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year backed the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and residents supported the independent. So there existed a little resistance. But overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.